One observation now. You: "But in order to overrun media..." and Rosen:"...professional journalism is no longer sovereign over territory it once easily controlled. Not sovereign doesn't mean you go away. It means your influence isn't singular anymore."
I don't (because I'm journalist :-)) see any particular need for the media being overrun. I do, however, see lots of opportunities in the co-existence of "traditional" media and grassroots media.
--Kari Haakana, 20-Jan-2005
Oh yes, my mistake. I meant to say "in order to overrun media" in a slightly sarcastic sense, referring to the previous sentence. Sorry.
I completely agree: There will be a coexistence. An uneasy one, but a coexistence. Blogs will cover things media can't and vice versa. Big stories will still be for the big media, because they are protected by big pockets.
--JanneJalkanen, 20-Jan-2005
"I am expecting much from Haltia (and some other political bloggers), now that the Helsinki City Council is starting its work."
No pressure what so ever ;) I promise to try my best though.
--Haltia, 21-Jan-2005
"Uneasy coexistence"? For some reason the journalist and the blogger in me seem to get together just fine.
--Kari Haakana, 21-Jan-2005
It's a good thing, too :)
I mean - my hope is that they will be watchdogs for each other. Not too cozy, but not too friendly either. And many will, of course, have no problem being both.
--JanneJalkanen, 22-Jan-2005
Hello to all, the contents existing at this site are in fact remarkable for people knowledge, well, keep up the nice work fellows. dcdfdbkegbgdkecd
--Smithe440, 14-Oct-2014
Very nice site!
--Pharmd267, 15-Oct-2014
Very nice site!
--Pharmd908, 15-Oct-2014
Hello!
--generic, 16-Oct-2014
|
More info...
Add comment
Back to entry
|
| "Main_comments_200105_1" last changed on 16-Oct-2014 20:32:47 EEST by generic. |
